VDM criticizes celebrities for financial support of Bobrisky
VDM criticizes celebrities for financial support of Bobrisky
Controversial internet personality, Very Dark Man (VDM), has doubled down on his criticism of celebrities who have offered financial support to crossdresser Bobrisky following his recent release from prison. In a video released on August 25, 2024, VDM responded to backlash he received over his previous comments, addressing the societal implications of endorsing figures like Bobrisky with monetary contributions.
VDM began his video by addressing the numerous comments he received from his audience regarding his earlier statements. He highlighted one particular comment that questioned his concerns, stating, “With respect to this Bobrisky thing and the people who contributed money, and in respect to my previous video, there was a particular comment that I saw where someone said, ‘Is it your money?’”
In response, VDM argued that the issue extends beyond personal financial choices. He suggested that such sponsorships have broader societal consequences and urged his followers to consider the impact of their actions. He stated, “If we are going by that, by now this country wouldn’t be the way it is. There are some people waiting to use their own money to sponsor harmful activities in this country. Yes, it is their money, but should we let them?”
VDM expressed deep concern about the potential influence of financially supporting someone like Bobrisky, particularly on young people who may be watching and learning from public figures. He questioned whether endorsing Bobrisky, a controversial figure known for his flamboyant lifestyle and public persona, sets a dangerous precedent for impressionable youth.
He stated, “There are some things that you do that will affect society and community, so because it’s not our money, we can’t talk about what would benefit us as people. Can you people think for yourselves? We all owe ourselves a better society, and everybody has a responsibility to play.”
VDM further elaborated on his stance, suggesting that supporting Bobrisky sends a message to young people that adopting a similar lifestyle could be a shortcut to success. “So because it’s their money, we should let them sponsor somebody that is showing the youths that if they can’t make money, they should transition and make money? The one that is teaching young boys that it’s okay to be girls? If that’s how you people were raised, would you have fathers? Because it’s their money, so what?” he continued.
VDM’s comments highlight the ethical implications of celebrity endorsements and financial support in influencing societal values and norms. He raised concerns about the responsibilities that come with wealth and influence, especially in a society where public figures can shape cultural narratives and impact the decisions of younger generations.
He suggested that the actions of celebrities who choose to financially support Bobrisky could inadvertently endorse lifestyles and choices that may not align with traditional societal values or that could lead to negative consequences for the community. “Rich people are bored and sometimes sponsor wars and kidnappings,” VDM argued, drawing a parallel to illustrate his point about the misuse of wealth.
The debate surrounding Bobrisky’s public persona and the support he has received from celebrities is not new. However, VDM’s recent comments have reignited discussions on the responsibility of public figures in shaping societal values. His statements have sparked a significant backlash, with many accusing him of intolerance and others defending his right to voice concerns about societal influences.
This controversy comes after celebrities like Don Jazzy and Tiwa Savage made headlines for donating millions of naira to Bobrisky following his release from prison. The donations, which were framed as acts of support and solidarity, have been met with mixed reactions from the public.
Bobrisky, whose real name is Okuneye Idris Olanrewaju, has been a polarizing figure in Nigeria’s social media landscape. Known for his gender-nonconforming appearance and provocative social media presence, Bobrisky has built a large following but also faced significant criticism and legal challenges. His recent release from prison brought renewed attention to his influence and the mixed reactions he elicits within Nigerian society.
For some, Bobrisky represents a symbol of freedom and self-expression in a society that often adheres to conservative values. For others, his lifestyle and the attention he commands are seen as detrimental to cultural norms and potentially harmful to impressionable young people.
VDM’s statements serve as a call for greater reflection on the role of influencers and celebrities in shaping societal values. His critique extends beyond Bobrisky to a broader concern about how wealth and influence are used and the messages they send to society, particularly to younger generations.
He called on his audience and fellow citizens to consider the broader impact of their actions and to think critically about the kind of society they want to build. “We all owe ourselves a better society, and everybody has a responsibility to play,” he said, urging a collective effort towards positive societal change.
As the debate continues, VDM’s comments have highlighted the complex and often contentious nature of public influence and the responsibilities that come with it. His stance against celebrities financially supporting Bobrisky has opened up a larger conversation about societal values, the impact of public figures, and the ethical use of influence and wealth.
While opinions remain divided, the controversy underscores the importance of ongoing dialogue about the role of culture, tradition, and modern influences in shaping the future of Nigerian society. As public figures like VDM and Bobrisky continue to command attention and provoke discussion, the conversation around influence, responsibility, and societal impact is likely to remain a central topic in Nigeria’s public discourse.
